Sunday, November 18, 2007

google walk

we need google walking maps:
(1) avoid hills -- the "alternative route" option which prioritizes topography by overlaying topo map data (readily available) with google mapping functionality;
(2) plan exercise route -- pull route out as google calculates distance and find some hills as google also calculates topography delta;
(3) drag and drop route changes -- like the new google maps feature, but without the car right of way requirements
(4) google algorithm that can suggest alternative routes based on popular routes chosen by others on google walk, allow you to find nearby hills, alternative route avoiding busy streets, increase hills, cut or add to distance, you get the idea.

benefits:
a. walking is green.
b. google walk = google bike = google run
c. exercise is good for human health and wellbeing.
d. walking gets people out into their community on a regular basis.

Monday, June 18, 2007

nara (june 2007)

we visited Nara on a daytrip from Kyoto

the kofukuji temple, with its five story pagoda, is a world heritage site
DSC_0242.jpg
check the cartoon version
DSC_0352.jpg

Nara is famous for the "semi-wild" or "tame" deer that roam about the park (the guidebook says there are 1000s).
DSC_0220.jpg
they were originally regarded as divine messengers of one of the shinto gods and now are a tourist attraction.
DSC_0233.jpg

the deer were not wary of humans (in part because we feed them deer biscuits sold by local vendors).
one result is you see fantastic deer cleaning tricks
DSC_0259.jpg
DSC_0255.jpg

in june, Nara also has lots of school kids
DSC_0244.jpg

including some who pestered, and petted, the deer
DSC_0268.jpg
DSC_0270.jpg

ignoring the angry deer warnings
DSC_0251.jpg

the juxtaposition was interesting
DSC_0267.jpg
DSC_0272.jpg

the todaiji temple, "the largest wooden building in the world," is another world heritage site
DSC_0277.jpg
it houses a huge buddha
DSC_0287.jpg
and a model of the temple which shows how it looks on the two days each year when they open the top windows to reveal the buddha
DSC_0318.jpg

inside they had this politely worded sign
sacred.jpg

Pindola sits outfront
DSC_0282.jpg
the explanation is interesting
pindola.jpg

kasuga taisha shrine, yet another world heritage site, is famous for its lanterns
DSC_0371.jpg

there is a 1000 year old japanese cedar tree in the courtyard of the shrine
DSC_0378.jpg
with a chinese juniper tree growing out of its roots and through the roof of one of the buildings
DSC_0383.jpg
i love that they commemorate this with a sign rather than cutting it down
cedar.jpg

nearby, i found this torii
DSC_0386.jpg

and this sign and tree
apricot.jpg
DSC_0388.jpg

vendors sold cutsie deer products all over the site
DSC_0333.jpg
DSC_0332.jpg
DSC_0393.jpg
DSC_0348.jpg
and deer were featured in ads
DSC_0253.jpg
DSC_0349.jpg
and on stone lanterns
DSC_0357.jpg

Wednesday, May 09, 2007

a new federal government

we (the "united states of america") need a new federal system. one body (“the fedreps”) instead of the president, senate, and house of representatives. 100 officials elected in a nationwide election (one vote per citizen). the top 100 form the government. the majority rules on regular governmental decisions, super majority for changes to basic rules and other more important issues. like a single-bodied parliment, hopefully without the crutch of party politics.

census.gov (http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/elections/votingage_population_and_voter_participation/) reports that there were 142 million registered voters in 2004 (72 percent of the 197 million citizens of voting age), and 125 million voted (63.8%). it was a presidential election so the numbers were high. one percent of registered voters would be around 1,420,000 (one percent of voters might be as low as 1,250,000). any group that could find that many voters, nationally, would be represented in the government. get one vote. with 100 representatives, the majority would hopefully balance into an effective representative government.

you would see a lot more women (67 million women voted in 2004, 58 million men). national-issue candidates (ralph nader, the greens, the aclu, the nra, aarp) would have a shot at proportional representation. as would local and regional candidates. we might get some television personalities. film stars. religious leaders. academics. authors. queers. republicans. democrats. independents? libertarians?

we might see voting blocks. the 2004 census data shows that we had 14 million black voters that year. and, voter drives might empower the 9 million additional black citizens of voting age. or the 13 million immigrants who were naturalized citizens eligible to vote but did not (7 million did vote; another 19 million are not u.s. citizens). 17 million voting veterans. 108 million voting non-veterans. we might see more mothers. maybe some school teachers?

urban areas would get proportional representation. big cities like ny (manhattan, brooklyn, queens and the bronx) and los angeles - with over 2 million voters each - would have significant voting power. as would the bay area (alameda, contra costa, san francisco, san mateo, santa clara) with 1,703,000 voters in 2004. washington d.c.’s 204,000 voters would finally get representation. (statistics by county: http://www.usatoday.com/news/politicselections/vote2004/PresidentialByCounty.aspx?oi=P&rti=G&sp=Ca&tf=l).

we could increase the number of representatives (with 150 representatives, it would take 1 million voters to elect a representative; with 300 representatives, it would take 500,000 voters to elect a representative). try to find a workable balance.

the current system clearly isn’t working. people distrust politicians. a number of people are not represented because the group they belong to has insufficient local numbers (but sufficient national numbers): greens; libertarians?; librarians?; goths?; major religions; geologists?; minor religions (depending on size); pagans who vote?; atheists?; welfare recipients?; vegetarians? small states currently have disproportionate power. urban areas are underrepresented. density is discriminated against.

Wednesday, January 31, 2007

hawaii part 4

day 8 we went scuba diving with south kona scuba. our dives were off the shore near puuhonua o honaunau (aka city of refuge). this was our 3d and 4th dives, and so we are still getting used to the whole elvin-magic breathing under water trick. i must say, though, it is an amazing experience. worth trying at some point in your life. i saw an eel poke its head out of a coral reef. and, we saw a sea turtle down deeper. and coral. and fish.

we mostly chilled the rest of the day. and visited a beach near sunset. from the beach, we saw what looked like a whale tail - it flipped up 10+ times in a row. so we tried to book a whale watching tour for day 9. the only time we could get, however, was early morning the day we were leaving.

day 9 we visited puuhonua o honaunau national historical park (aka city of refuge).
DSC_0580.jpg
the guidebook says these are modern carved effigies of gods
DSC_0582.jpg
i found some interesting details that the brady bunch failed to highlight
DSC_0581.jpg
DSC_0583.jpg

the guidebook says this spot held the royal palace and a puuhonau sanctuary. my understanding is that certain things were kapu - forbidden - by hawaiian law/custom. for which, the punishment was death. if you made it to a sanctuary, you would be absolved. however, you had to get past the armed warriors (of the royal palace) and/or make it by sea (the guidebook mentions shark infested waters).

we saw more basking sea turtles. and a nice place to chill with the ocean.
DSC_0609.jpg
and look for fish
DSC_0594.jpg

we then went to mauna kea - a dormant volcano with a peak of 13,796 feet above sea level (plus 19,678 feet below sea level, since it starts on the ocean floor).
DSC_0619.jpg
with a 4wd, you can drive to the top, where they have a bunch of observatories.
DSC_0615.jpg
DSC_0614.jpg
we learned that the big island is perfect for the observatories because: (1) hawaii is isolated from other land masses, so the wind is more calm; (2) light pollution is minimized due to distance to cities, special street lamps the cities use, and the fact that clouds often box in the city light; (3) hawaii is close to the equator, which is better for seeing more of the sky; and (4) the atmosphere is thinner at the top.

and you can see a bunch of cone shaped peaks (some laced with snow) for the volcano.
DSC_0623.jpg
DSC_0626.jpg
DSC_0628.jpg
it is cold, and you cannot go into the observatories there, but it is nice to see.

down the road a bit, the ellison onizuka visitor center has telescopes set up for star gazing and a volunteer points out some interesting bits in the sky. check the weather - we visited our first night and it was cloudy. on this night, it was cloudy until we got to the visitor center and we had a sparkly clear sky to see. it was beautiful. and, we learned that the visitor center is a better place for people to star gaze because the lower atmosphere up top makes people dizzy.

day 10 we left our house early (6am) to go whale watching. humpback whales retreat to hawaii in the winter and kona is a good place for whale watching.
DSC_0732.jpg
DSC_0733.jpg
we saw a few whales breach.
DSC_0735.jpg
as did this person in the small boat
DSC_0734.jpg
we saw a bunch of whales not breaching
DSC_0669.jpg
DSC_0671.jpg
and learned that you can identify hunchbacks by their tails
DSC_0742.jpg
DSC_0744.jpg
we also saw some dolphins
DSC_0722.jpg
(view the whole whale watching slideshow)

then, after lunch on the beach, we caught an early afternoon flight back to sf.